nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
When stripping labels off cardboard cans, you use a safety blade to cut the labels in half, and that requires pinching the label to make a little gap to slide the blade in. We got a bunch of new temps today, and one of them was having trouble with the cutting; she kept referring to the gap as a "hole", saying she was "having trouble finding the hole".

And in the midst of a bunch of us loling about the unintentional double entendre, she busts out with "well, I ain't a fucking dyke" to, presumably, explain why she's not good at hole-finding.

Guess how many people acted as if "dyke" isn't an okay thing to say. I bet you guessed right, unless you have any faith in people at all.

One guy, one of the ones who started today, said he didn't think anyone there was. Because three hours is enough time to tell that, because any amount of time is enough time to tell, because everyone's a stereotype.

And I kind of felt like garbage for not saying anything, but seven or eight people not even flinching - more than that, laughing like crazy - at the word, at the very idea that someone around them might be omggay, that's a little daunting.

IDK. I mostly kept my headphones in for the rest of the day after that. And I...if nothing else, I feel like maybe I'm making the right decision being closeted, even if it makes me feel kind of cowardly and leads to awkward situations like the brother setup.

Speaking of headphones, I'm gonna need you all to buy or download Mika's new album, The Boy Who Knew Too Much. It's a big rainbow in audio form, like Life In Cartoon Motion but better. Toy Boy (lyrics) is completely 100% about Kevron (and actually works fairly neatly as a several-years-in-the-future Zac-POV coda to [livejournal.com profile] blackwayfarers's Slow Dancing In A Burning Room. I was jotting down fic notes earlier and realized that's all I was doing, writing embittered Burning-Room-'verse future!Zac).

Seriously:

It’s a cruel cross that I have to bear
If you come a little close I’m going to pull your hair
More than just a toy in a patch-blue suit
Hold me in your arms I’m just a boy like you

But your mama thought there was somethin’ wrong
Didn’t want you sleeping with a boy too long
It’s a serious thing in a grown-up world
Maybe you’d be better with a Barbie girl


Anyway, Kevron aside, it's completely impossible to be anything but happy listening to Mika.

In other music news, I finally got around to downloading Cobra Starship's Hot Mess, and I'm really disappointed no one told me there was a Cash Cash remix of Good Girls Go Bad. That is just way too much electronic cheesy scene awesomeness for me to handle unprepared.
south side uther
so I got put in a really awkward position today

people at work don't know I'm a lesbian. like, not just not know, but actively assume I'm straight, and...for whatever reason, I've done nothing to address that assumption. mostly because they're all kind of rednecky, with all the shit that goes along with that.

so randomly today some girl decided she wants to set me up with her brother. and I had this total anxiety panic breakdown moment and my brain went to this place where my only possible answers were LOL I'M A LESBIAN or OKAY SURE AWESOME.

so now some guy is getting my number and is going to call me at some point for a date. and she showed me his picture and he is REDNECKY. and, I mean, you are aware there are men that kind of DISABLE the lesbian thing but none of them are REDNECKY. they are GIRLY. so.

also she asked me when we were sitting alone but then she mentioned it to some people so there are MULTIPLE PEOPLE at work who are going to want, like, GOSSIP about my heterosexual experience

I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO DO, HELP.

Also, not a single one of the things I worked on in counseling are getting me to stop kicking my ass over not being all I AM A DYKE right from the get-go. NORMALLY I AM REALLY GOOD ABOUT THAT. But it's not like I could've foreseen this! Who looks at someone who lip-syncs and dances to the High School Musical soundtracks on her iPod while working and thinks OMG PERFECT SISTER-IN-LAW MATERIAL.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
I'm really waffling over whether or not I want to move to Dreamwidth. The recent LJ ads thing really, really bothered me (long story short, NOM bought ads through Google to display for the keywords "gay marriage", so anti-gay ads showed up on the flists/posts/etc. of LGBT people and allies, and there were also fetishistic ads about "ladyboys" showing up on the flists/posts/etc. of transpeople).

I'm not one of those who blames LJ for it, I'm aware that if I want to blame anyone for the ad system being set up in such a game-able way it's Google, and that really the party to blame are the insufferable bigots at NOM for buying the ads with those keywords in the first place.

And it probably makes me look horribly selfish, as a Plus user who's opened myself to ads from the beginning (sort of. I do use AdBlock so I rarely, if ever, see any), who's known from the beginning I have no control over the advertising that displays with my journal, to get bothered now that the hypothetical - the lack of control leading to something really objectionable - is a reality, in a way that specifically offends me. But here I am, offended, and uncomfortable.

I think my account's old enough I could revert to Basic, and lose most of my icons :( get rid of the ads on my LJ specifically. But right now I'm uncomfortable with the idea as a whole - that as long as LJ uses an ad service it doesn't control, as long as LJ doesn't take an ideological stance on every single political issue likely to see an ad, this might keep happening. I'm not sure I really want any part of a service that's willing to take the chance it will make money promoting discrimination against me.

So...I don't know. That said, I definitely can't afford a paid account, so if anyone's got a spare invite code to toss my way...?*puppy eyes*

(I know I'm late to the party on the anti-gay ad thing. I keep turning it over in my head and being kind of okay with it, and then not, and then...over and over and over. So.)
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30089125/

I can't stop OMGing. CAN'T STOP. omg.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
Fuck you, Governor Douglas.

I was trying not to get my hopes up too much. But we were so close. And in VT a bill can become law without the governor's signature - he could disapprove without actively veto-ing.

So FUCK YOU. Argh.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
This trainwreck, specifically the part starting here, left me wanting to organize my thoughts on reclamation a bit more.

I think of myself as a dyke. Generally, outside my own head, when I use "dyke" I'm talking about things I do which fit into stereotypes about non-porno lesbians - shaving my head was dykey, sports bra + ribbed tank + scuzzy jeans is a dykey outfit, etc. - but I identify as "dyke" more than "lesbian". Or, not necessarily more, but in a different way - when I'm just talking about my sexuality in a more straightforward, matter-of-fact way, I use "lesbian", but when I'm talking about it as a source of pride, as a challenged way of being that I don't feel any shame for and don't believe I should, I'm a big ol' dyke.

It's not an accident the derogatory term is the one I use when I'm talking about pride, about shame, about lesbianism as politically and morally charged. It's me very actively saying "not only will I not hate myself for the thing you hate me for, I will be proud of it".

Reclamation is taking a slur and turning it into a positive identifier, taking the power out of the hands of the bigots who spew hate speech and claiming it for one's own. It's taking someone's weapon and knocking it out of his hand. If someone wants to make me feel hated, scummy, worthless, it's telling him he has to find another goddamn way because calling me a dyke just doesn't do that anymore.

It does the opposite.

*

What happens all too often with reclamation is a backlash from Well-Meaning [insert privileged group] People, who are so sensitive and open-minded that the use of a slur offends them regardless of context. So, of course, because it makes the Well-Meaning Privileged uncomfortable, it just shouldn't be used at all. The intentions of the Well-Meaning Privileged are good, I don't use "Well-Meaning" sarcastically, but you know what they say about good intentions.

When you, Well-Meaning Straight Person, tell me I cannot call myself a dyke, you're disarming me, taking one of the few defense tactics I have and asking me to set it aside, leave myself open, in deference to your misplaced discomfort. Because I am far more likely to defer to Well-Meaning Discomfort than the bigot is, and when I set my weapon down he will be right there to pick it back up. And when he uses it, you will be uncomfortable.

Your discomfort is that of someone standing too close to a gun when it goes off, it's temporary deafness and ringing ears. You're not the one with the bullet wound.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
There was a post at Feministing, titled Marge's Lesbian Fantasies, about Sunday night's episode of The Simpsons.

Or, rather, about a screenshot from the episode, because if the poster had actually seen it, she would've known that it wasn't Marge's lesbian fantasy, it was Homer's.

*sigh*

One more instance of a straight man fetishizing lesbian sex is totally something a feminst blog should be celebrating. I wish I could be so cheerful in the face of yet another reminder my sexuality is only okay when it benefits anyone but me.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
Yesterday, I got up bright and early to vote because the sister wanted to go before school. I voted Obama, watched the counter tick from 138 to 139, and last night went off to Burlington for awesome free voter goodies. And I stayed up through a pounding migraine to watch the landslide happen, stayed up long enough to watch McCain's very gracious concession, and went off to bed happy, not to mention damn proud.

Today I just feel tired and defeated. Every single anti-LGBT ballot initiative - 3 anti-gay-marriage and one anti-gay-adoption - passed, some rather overwhelmingly. Well, Proposition 8 hasn't been called yet, but it's ahead with 95% of precincts reporting. I don't even understand how someone can walk into a booth and think "alright, time to take away some rights", but 52% of people did just that. And celebrated.

Last night, the nation told POC that yes, the ceiling really is glass, that it can be shattered and yes, you can do anything you want. And that's fabulous, and any other day I'd be gushing with everyone else.

But last night the nation told me I'm too much of a deviant to deserve the same rights everyone else has. So I haven't quite been able to get into the celebratory mindset I'd like to.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
So I'd say I'm making this short and simple so it's easy to understand but I've seen people misunderstand it even in these simplest of terms so really I'm keeping it short because I don't have the energy.

Gay people are treated differently from straight people at this point in time, in this culture. To ignore that is to invalidate the experience of many, probably most, gays and lesbians. 99.99% of the time, "it's the same thing" when referring to an action, word, thought, whatever applied to a gay person in one instance and a straight person in another is an incorrect statement. And 100% of the time, accusing the gay person, or socially aware ally, who pointed that out to you of applying double standards makes you look like a douche.

And I can say this as someone who has used the "um, it's the same thing, and by saying otherwise you're the homophobe" argument". It's really not that hard to admit you're wrong.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
Fuck yes, Connecticut.

Connecticut's Supreme Court ruled Friday that same-sex couples have the right to marry, making that state the third behind Massachusetts and California to legalize such unions.

The divided court ruled 4-3 that gay and lesbian couples cannot be denied the freedom to marry under the state constitution, and Connecticut's civil unions law does not provide those couples with the same rights as heterosexual couples.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27117467/
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
So I wanna talk about identity. Because I've gotten a few times lately, from a few different people, the implication - if not direct statement - that I am somehow wrong, or naive, or stupid/foolish/what-have-you for considering my lesbianism a defining characteristic.

And part of the reason I don't talk about it is it requires saying "straight people generally don't have this problem" and I find people react so weirdly to that - which I think comes from what I posted about yesterday, this idea of finite problems. Because if there are, I dunno, only two problems in the world and gay people say "this is only a gay problem" and POC say "this is only a POC problem", the implication is that straight people, white people, have no problems. But problems are most definitely not finite, and no one is saying "this is a strictly gay issue, straight people don't have issues". So the defensiveness is really out of place.

But here it is. See...there are a lot of facets to my identity. I'm a lesbian, I'm a cat person, I'm a student, I'm a glasses-wearer, I'm an oldest child with middle-child syndrome, I have anxiety problems, I'm fat, etc.

Some of those are less important. I could be a dog person without being a different person, I could have good eyesight and not be different, I could be a middle child and be the same old me.

But there are things on that list that are fundamental to who I am. I would have had vastly different life experiences if I weren't fat, and thus the person I am today would not be the same. And my experiences from here on out will be different than if everything else were the same but 100 pounds lighter, the way I parse things is different, I am different. And in the same way, my life - and the person I am - would be extremely different were I straight.

I pull out those two examples for a reason: they are things that society (either as a whole, or just massive parts) tell me I should be ashamed of. So merely by not being ashamed - by accepting that this is what I look like, and I will focus on my health and not worry about the looks, by saying there is nothing wrong with me being attracted to and loving women exclusively - I am fighting. And this is the problem straight people don't have - that daily struggle, the near-constant need to prove you're normal, you're worth being treated like a human.

(And really, people, do I need to say this? YES I understand discrimination against gays isn't the only kind that exists, what kind of idiot do you think I am? Focusing on one specific discrimination in one specific context isn't the same as saying "I'm the only person who's ever been discriminated against ever")

And that's where it starts to look like I'm privileging one facet of my identity over any others - because that one facet is under attack. Because, yes, all things being equal being gay would be no different than being straight, but what world do you live in where all things are equal? So I have to fight (well...I don't have to, but to put it baldly I consider people who lie back and take their oppression with open arms fools), and so I have to call attention, and then rather than getting it from one side with "you're not okay" I get from the other side "you're not identifying right".

So here it is, in simplest terms. When something I consider fundamental to my identity is under attack, I will fight back. Fighting back requires calling attention; calling attention gives the impression of valuing one facet over another. This doesn't mean I consider being a lesbian the be-all end-all of Me - but nor does it mean I don't consider it more important than other things.

Or, Hell, have it in even simpler terms: Shut the fuck up and stop telling me how to parse my own identity, you privileged assholes.

Privilege

Sep. 30th, 2008 11:30 am
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
So...I was cleaning out my Documents folder this morning, and I found the beginnings of this long-winded blather about privilege and intersectionality...and I was gonna finish it up, but I realized it boiled down to just a couple sentences.

There is no finite number of privilege/oppression systems that can exist at any one tume; therefore, the existence of one oppression/privilege system doesn't negate the existence of others. Lack of one set of privileges doesn't mean you can't benefit from another (I see this a lot in discussions of white privilege: "I can't have white privilege, I'm poor!" No, what you don't have is class privilege - you still have white privilege [and depending on the person: straight, male, etc. privileges]). The fact that one oppression/privilege system may be more extreme/harsh/whatever than another doesn't mean the latter doesn't exist.

Any questions?

And from now on, rather than dignifying any "you can't have problems because other people do" comments with original responses, I'm just gonna link to this post. Because I do not have the energy.
nicole anderson, b&w, big hair
So this is pretty badass: a list of youtube links to lesbian love songs.

"To make the list: the singer must be a woman; the love lyrics must be obvious; and the love object must be unmistakably a woman. Not friendship love, but undisguised sensuality, an open expression of same-sex attraction."